can2joy –Use your car as a life-sized controller for your racing game on Linux!

(At the moment, only the following model has been tested: Volkswagen Golf Mk 6)

Upstream developers: changing your already released tarballs is an antipattern and breaks reproducabilty. We all make errors, we don't hate you for releasing a -repack1.tar.gz :)

And I wondered whether there is a correlation of "our code" projects being organised socially in a way that makes it difficult for new users to contribute, and as such "prove their worth to the community" by taking all those extra hurdles to get their contribution in. These projects would possibly also be more opposed to explicit docs or codes of conduct.

So here's an unproven hypothesis, there's probably a PhD or master's thesis hidden in there somewhere :)

At I heard a talk today about one-time contributions to projects [1]. The main focus was what to do best to get your contribution accepted, but it also included a categorisation of projects into "our code" projects, which basically ask why your contribution is worthy enough to be accepted, and "your code" projects that ask "how can we maintain your contribution in the long term".

[1] Diary of a Drive by Coder, by James Bottomley,

When writing change logs for version control, definitely include the "why". 

I guess it's time for .

I'm a mostly harmless person living in , .

My current job is working with and on , in my spare time I'm involved in @stratum0, our . Other interests include , and learning languages for fun – I'm fluent in and , can also understand and , and read a lot of other scripts to some extent. Mi ankaŭ provas studi la ​n. - because anarchy is much more fun with friends. is a small Mastodon instance for and by the Chaos community surrounding the Chaos Computer Club. We provide a small community space - Be excellent to each other, and have a look at what that means around here.
Follow @ordnung for low-traffic instance-related updates.
The primary instance languages are German and English.