Follow

🇩🇪 Die EU plant mit der die anlasslose Echtzeit-Massenüberwachung deiner gesamten privaten Online-Kommunikation. Worum geht es, wie geht es weiter und wie kannst du dich wehren?

patrick-breyer.de/?page_id=594

🇬🇧 With , the EU wants of all your private online communications in real-time. What is it about, what will happen next and what can you do?

patrick-breyer.de/?page_id=594

@echo_pbreyer so.. I used to think EU is good, guess I'll have to go to the moon now...

@metalune
It never was good.
We need open source, decentralized, end-to-end encrypted messenging
@echo_pbreyer

@fasse @echo_pbreyer it's sad that we even have to encrypt our messages if you think about it...

@metalune @fasse @echo_pbreyer
This is something I miss from the offline world.

Offline, you can have your privacy and, if necessary, the police can get in and investigate your stuff to prove the wrong thing you are doing.

Being online either you have everything well encrypted or everything opened what gives space for governments to do that kind of thing.

@brunofontes
No not quite. In the offline world in many countries you have a constitutional right to secrecy of correspondence, that says that noone exept to whom you send a letter is allowed to read it. So in fact I think it should be mandatory that all messenger services must encrypt. Same rights online as offline, of course in some instances the police can take your letters if they search your house, the same may be applied to digital messenges if you want that
@metalune @echo_pbreyer

@fasse @metalune @echo_pbreyer but each country has your own rules about that and the online world has just 2 options.

Here, the police might hear your phone calls if they need to and search inside your house for letters. So you would need to destroy them or giving them away, while in criptography, you would say "I don't have the password anymore".

Maybe new laws to enforce someone to unlock an encrypted file if the police has rights to research in your house could work.

@brunofontes
Yes, the details may change, but by default should all be encrypted. Courts may force you to decrypt some or something, but I think encrypted messenging, and being able to for sure know that it is, is a fundamental right
@metalune @echo_pbreyer

@fasse I agree with you. We need our privacy. I have my own servers for mostly everything I use, everything encrypted.

I just also think about the Police, as they also need to do their work and how to avoid the governments excuses to keep accessing our data as much as possible.

@metalune @echo_pbreyer

@echo_pbreyer
If there's any definition of Orwellian, this is it, snd by far much more dangerous than any other thing we've ever seen.

Arrest your political enemies with the click of a button!

@echo_pbreyer This kind of crap is probably why brexit happened and I wouldn't be surprised if more countries left because of this.

@swiley @echo_pbreyer

Nothing to do with Brexit, the UK likely already has more extreme monitoring in place than most remaining EU countries as far as I know. What led to Brexit was xenophobia, lies about funding the NHS, and lies about the EU and sovereignty.

The EU is a mix of good and bad, this is one of the bad ones. But leaving the EU opens the door for even worse things not better ones, as can be seen with the UK wanting to get rid of worker protections and human rights inconveniences.

@echo_pbreyer @OSE I read the legislation proposal. There are proposing surveillance but there is zero mention of automation and realtime processing, hence the very first part of your article is void:

“The result: Mass surveillance through fully automated real-time messaging and chat control and the end of secrecy of digital correspondence.”

They stupidly just mentioned that they will use “state-of-the-art technology” and “human review” which is dumb as we all know any NLP has False Positive.

@echo_pbreyer @OSE the proposal in question:

europarl.europa.eu/RegData/doc

Pay special attention to the last section of page 8 and the vague language and terminology they have used to specify the “technology”.

Child abuse is definitely awful, terrible and wrong, but combating it this way will just open tons of backdoors to peoples’ lives that can be abused by anyone slightly smarter than these legislators.

@Mehrad
Until NLP problem with false positives is solved, or until there's a better techno for it. Then this argument doesn't hold and cannot be used as an excuse for ignoring the threat.

@echo_pbreyer @OSE

@lefarfadet @echo_pbreyer @OSE Don't get me wrong, the threat to privacy is real and there (as my next post shows).

All I'm saying is that:

1. we should not freely and wrongly paraphrase the legislative text

2. NLP is not even industry standard but so far the best we have and I don't bet my life and privacy on it

3. unless tech-savvy and privacy-oriented people does not come up with a valid solutions, politicians will screw all we have (e.g Tutanota's court and implemented "backdoor")

@Mehrad
Technically accurate but ... how kuch human review would anyone be willing to afford while trying to surveil all messages between hundreds of millions of people?

Automation of this thing is inevitable, and recent history tells us about the quantity and quality of any human review in that loop. Any human reviewer would be penalized for stepping in too much nonody will know if they just say yes to everything. So guess what happens...
@echo_pbreyer @OSE

@Mr_Teatime
What I meant was that we should not paraphrase and add unstated claims to the mix when we want to raise awareness. We should stick to facts and only elaborate to what is stated, unless and until we clarify that “it would be inevitable to have automation” or “in my opinion...”

@echo_pbreyer @OSE

@echo_pbreyer
Mass surveillance = "trying to find a needle in a haystack by piling on more hay"

@echo_pbreyer
Waaait, you're saying Facebook has that in place already? I thought Whatsapp contents were securely end-to-end encrypted?

I mean, I'm sure they'll be happy to collect and use all the metadata (that is: they already do), but I thought contents were inaccessible to them?

@Mr_Teatime They don't have it in place for encrypted Whatsapp content. However the EU is considering to mandate even for encrypted communications.

@echo_pbreyer
Fine. How should I pass this on to people voting for CDU? Most off them don't understand english.
I have the feeling that we, like happend in BREXIT, get fucked by our parents.

Also wenn Du das in Deutschland verhindern willst, musst Du es in verständlicher Sprache verteilen. Englisch wird jedenfalls vom deutschen Durchschnittswähler nicht verstanden.

@echo_pbreyer Was ist denn unter Weiterleitung an "Nichtregierungsorganisationen" zu verstehen? Soll jetzt von der EU Polizeiarbeit privatisiert werden?

Und wer stellt die "Künstliche Intelligenz" bereit?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
chaos.social

chaos.social – a Fediverse instance for & by the Chaos community