Ursula K. Le Guin on "technology" 

"Technology is the active human interface with the material world.

But the word is consistently misused to mean only the enormously complex and specialised technologies of the past few decades, supported by massive exploitation both of natural and human resources.

This is not an acceptable use of the word. "Technology" and "hi tech" are not synonymous, and a technology that isn't "hi," isn't necessarily "low" in any meaningful sense.

We have been so desensitized by a hundred and fifty years of ceaselessly expanding technical prowess that we think nothing less complex and showy than a computer or a jet bomber deserves to be called "technology " at all. As if linen were the same thing as flax — as if paper, ink, wheels, knives, clocks, chairs, aspirin pills, were natural objects, born with us like our teeth and fingers -- as if steel saucepans with copper bottoms and fleece vests spun from recycled glass grew on trees, and we just picked them when they were ripe..."

ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-

Follow

Ursula K. Le Guin on "technology" 

@entreprecariat
very interesting thoughts.

but i have learnt a different definition of hard/soft scifi. where hard means it is possible with the currently known physical properties of our universe and so a possible future, and soft means its not strictly following the laws of physics as we know them and is more leaning towards "fantasy".

Sign in to participate in the conversation
chaos.social

chaos.social – a Fediverse instance for & by the Chaos community