Follow

RMS, open letter, signing 

Yes, I signed the open letter: rms-open-letter.github.io/

I was always skeptical about person cults within the free software movement, RMS is not the only problematic name. Most disturbing is though people arguing that he should be out of criticism because of what he did for the movement.
1/3

Β· Β· Web Β· 2 Β· 9 Β· 20

RMS, open letter, signing 

That argument so absolutely missing the point. People must be held accountable for their actions _regardless_ their status. If we excuse discriminatory and abusive behavior from people because what they achieved in the past (no-one doubts that there were great achievements) then we are supporting mistreatment, which is fundamentally against a free society, and the free software principles in the first place.
2/3

RMS, open letter, signing 

Do not put on your blindfolds to see just that. No-one is taking away that part from him, but not holding him accountable because of that? You are totally missing the point with arguing that way.
3/3

RMS, open letter, signing 

@rhonda I did not sign the letter, because they try to hold rms accountable for several things he did not do.

See rollenspiel.social/@ArneBab/10

RMS, open letter, signing 

@ArneBab @rhonda

You don't have to sign the letter. You can write one on your own.

RMS, open letter, signing 

@akshay @rhonda A manipulative pseudo-binary choice …

RMS, open letter 

@akshay @rhonda --- removed to honor my decision not to get into discussions on this ---

RMS, open letter, signing 

@rhonda Thanks for the pointer, signed.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
chaos.social

chaos.social – a Fediverse instance for & by the Chaos community