Richard Stallman thinks @Tusky is free software. https://forum.f-droid.org/t/tusky-is-nonfree/6448/50 #Tusky
OCR Output (chars: 813)
We've identified bad side of a platform that
censors no one. Zero censorship means extreme
speech can happen. But have you weighed the
pros and cons? Is there any good side? I think
there is. In fact, I think the good outweighs the bad.
I understand that it can be very hard to imagine
how free speech is worth it in the end, but please
bear with me.
Marginalized people are at the greatest risk of
being impacted by censorship. The Feminist
movement laid the groundwork for freedom of
speech in the United States with the formation of
the Free Speech League in 1902. They were being
censored from distributing material about sex-
education and abortion. Keep in mind that the
majority of people were against them at the time.
How can you be so sure you're on the right side of
@Bobo_PK I dunno ask the fossbros
@ConnyDuck Hell no. I am now fully belonging to the working class. I will not waste my free time to explain the tolerance paradox to libertarians because others already did in the thread and it looks like they do not care or understand.
@Bobo_PK 👌 😂
@ConnyDuck Richard Stallman DESTROYS Gab fanboys with FACTS and LOGIC
Fucking FOSSbros wanking themselves into a fury over protecting the Freedumb of Speech for Nazis. Its all a pose, its all a con.
While stallman’s comment is, I guess, welcome, notice that even though his response doesn’t address a single one of the VERY URGENT points raised in the sealioning before it, the fashyFOSSbros back down immediately because, of course
@ConnyDuck lmao at the spineless asshole one post above who signed up a week ago solely to stink up that thread and then has the cajones to complain about the veracity of the wiki page
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!